@supersnips - evaluating IP addresses, there were 5 individuals who had multiple votes. 4 people voted x2 times,, 1 voted x17 times. This is over half the votes being gamed.
We are sorry for changing the voting mechanism, but the voting on xdc.dev
method provides the lowest barrier to entry where someone can't vote twice or 17 times in a row. If people are interested in casting a vote, they should be ok with signing up for an xdc.dev account.
If that is the case it is fine by me. Lets keep it manual vote in here. I still haven't decided if to Vote yes or No and would like to hear some more community input.
Hey Snips, I voted earlier today on my tablet, then later today on my computer went to check the results and it let me vote again. It was not a safe and secure voting mechanism. We need high-visuality and accountability for this highly important community proposal.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
@supersnips - evaluating IP addresses, there were 5 individuals who had multiple votes. 4 people voted x2 times,, 1 voted x17 times. This is over half the votes being gamed.
We are sorry for changing the voting mechanism, but the voting on xdc.dev
method provides the lowest barrier to entry where someone can't vote twice or 17 times in a row. If people are interested in casting a vote, they should be ok with signing up for an xdc.dev account.
If that is the case it is fine by me. Lets keep it manual vote in here. I still haven't decided if to Vote yes or No and would like to hear some more community input.
Hey Snips, I voted earlier today on my tablet, then later today on my computer went to check the results and it let me vote again. It was not a safe and secure voting mechanism. We need high-visuality and accountability for this highly important community proposal.