All three points are very valid and very much needed. Currently there is no way to change a wallet in the case it is compromised. This forces the node operator to having to unstake their node, wait 30 das (cooling off period) to receive their collateral (10m XDC) and then hope that you are faster than the scammers to move the funds when withdrawing the assets from the compromised wallet to a new one (hopefully a hardware wallet). As node operators, we need this feature ASAP.
I also agree that we should maintain the simplicity of validators and standby's vs adding 2 layers of nodes (Protector and Observer), that will serve the same function they serve now. To be quite honest, I still dont see the reason of implementing Protectors and Observers if they are going to do what the rest of the nodes are doing. They're not going to do anything special or different than the rest of the nodes.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
All three points are very valid and very much needed. Currently there is no way to change a wallet in the case it is compromised. This forces the node operator to having to unstake their node, wait 30 das (cooling off period) to receive their collateral (10m XDC) and then hope that you are faster than the scammers to move the funds when withdrawing the assets from the compromised wallet to a new one (hopefully a hardware wallet). As node operators, we need this feature ASAP.
I also agree that we should maintain the simplicity of validators and standby's vs adding 2 layers of nodes (Protector and Observer), that will serve the same function they serve now. To be quite honest, I still dont see the reason of implementing Protectors and Observers if they are going to do what the rest of the nodes are doing. They're not going to do anything special or different than the rest of the nodes.