I don't think so. We've provided hosting support for XDC for just under two years now and we've received some great feedback from our operators whom we host nodes, for keep the setup and provisioning process simple and straightforward. At most it would be more of a mutual endorsement on an alternative hosting option for the XDC community that is reliable. Or simply being added to a list of other third party hosting providers within your documentation.
We would be open to direct contact (i.e. via Telegram, email, etc) with dev/eng teams on prospective roll outs on node software to test on our fleet if needed. We had some great success with this kind of relationship on other projects we support.
I don't think so. We've provided hosting support for XDC for just under two years now and we've received some great feedback from our operators whom we host nodes, for keep the setup and provisioning process simple and straightforward. At most it would be more of a mutual endorsement on an alternative hosting option for the XDC community that is reliable. Or simply being added to a list of other third party hosting providers within your documentation.
We would be open to direct contact (i.e. via Telegram, email, etc) with dev/eng teams on prospective roll outs on node software to test on our fleet if needed. We had some great success with this kind of relationship on other projects we support.
I'm already aware of some node operators using your services and they've been happy. Sounds perfect and Iād definitely support this proposal š